Central banks themselves are not currently known to be directly testing Bitcoin as collateral for loans, but major financial institutions, particularly JPMorgan Chase, are actively moving toward accepting Bitcoin and Ethereum as collateral for institutional loans by the end of 2025. This development signals a significant step in integrating digital assets into mainstream finance and could influence central banks’ perspectives and policies regarding cryptocurrencies as collateral.
JPMorgan Chase, one of the largest global banks, plans to allow its institutional clients worldwide to use Bitcoin and Ether holdings as collateral for credit lines and structured financing products. The digital assets will be held by third-party custodians to manage operational risks and protect both clients and the bank. This initiative builds on JPMorgan’s earlier acceptance of crypto-linked exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as collateral and reflects growing institutional demand and regulatory clarity around cryptocurrencies. The bank treats these digital assets similarly to traditional collateral such as stocks, bonds, and gold, aiming to integrate crypto assets into existing financial infrastructure seamlessly[1][2][4][5].
The move by JPMorgan is part of a broader trend where banks and financial institutions are expanding crypto services amid rising adoption and evolving regulatory environments. The bank first explored crypto-backed lending in 2022 but paused the project due to market volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Renewed interest is driven by Bitcoin reaching new all-time highs, improved regulatory conditions, and increased institutional demand. JPMorgan’s approach includes significant risk management measures, such as custody by third parties and margin requirements, although details on valuation and eligibility criteria are still being finalized[2][3][6].
From a risk perspective, using Bitcoin as collateral introduces unique challenges. Bitcoin and Ethereum are highly volatile assets that trade 24/7 globally, unlike traditional financial markets that operate during business hours. This mismatch can create contagion risks where sharp price drops in crypto markets could trigger margin calls and forced selling, potentially impacting broader financial markets. For example, a significant drop in Bitcoin’s price over a weekend could reduce collateral value, prompting borrowers to sell other assets to maintain loan coverage, which might lead to cascading price declines across multiple asset classes. This interconnectedness raises concerns about systemic risk and regulatory oversight[3].
Despite these risks, crypto collateral does not necessarily have to be inherently risky if managed properly. Banks can apply conservative loan-to-value ratios with substantial haircuts to cover potential price drops. Additionally, since crypto tokens are bearer assets, placing them in bank custody allows lenders to seize and liquidate collateral quickly in case of default, reducing recovery risk. The acceptance of crypto as collateral could also create a positive feedback loop by increasing demand for digital assets, enhancing their financial utility, and potentially lifting prices, which in turn could support larger loans and generate higher fees for banks[6].
While JPMorgan’s initiative is a watershed moment for banks and institutional finance, central banks have so far taken a more cautious stance. Central banks typically focus on monetary policy, financial stability, and regulatory frameworks rather than direct lending practices involving cryptocurrencies. However, the increasing integration of crypto assets into traditional banking systems, as exemplified by JPMorgan’s plans, may prompt central banks to study and possibly pilot frameworks for crypto collateral in the future. Such experiments would likely involve rigorous risk assessments, regulatory safeguards, and coordination with financial institutions to ensure systemic stability.
In summary, although central banks are not publicly known to be testing Bitcoin as collateral for loans at this time, major commercial banks like JPMorgan are pioneering this practice for institutional clients. This trend reflects growing acceptance of digital assets in mainstream finance and could influence central banks’ future policies and experiments with crypto collateral. The move involves balancing the benefits of enhanced financial utility and institutional adoption against the risks of volatility and systemic contagion, requiring careful risk management and regulatory oversight.

